In: movies,
experiencesI finally saw
Omkara after reading a lot about it on the blogosphere (
here and
here for instance) last Sunday. And so that I can enjoy it fully I saw
Maqbool the day before so that I'm in a Shakespearean mode. To be frank, I haven't read any Shakespeare. But I'd seen
Throne of Blood which was
Akira Kurosawa's take on
Macbeth and so I was able to identify the main characters in Maqbool quite early on. I had seen the ending of Maqbool before, even before I saw Throne of Blood. So I knew what was going to happen in the end and I was enjoying how the various characters were portrayed. It was also quite enjoyable trying to identify how the various characters in Maqbool differed from or were similar to the corresponding ones in Throne of Blood. But Omkara was slightly different. I knew it was based on
Othello. But the only things about the story of Othello that I knew were: 1. Its a tragedy, 2. both the heroine and the hero die in the end and 3. that a close acquintance of the hero has a role to play in 2. And I knew all this because I saw the end of
'O', the movie starring Mekhi Phifer, Julia Stiles and Josh Hartnett. But I didn't know anything about the rest of the movie. So this time except for those three characters there wasn't anything else in the movie I could identify. So I was enjoying the language in the movie - the raw, hardcore hindi of the Hindi Heartland. To put it in one word 'Amazing'. Rough on the ears probably, but amazing. Nothing has felt more real-life than listening to the dialogs there-in. I didn't feel like I was sitting in a movie theater watching a movie called Omkara; It felt like I was in UP sitting next to a thug spitting tobacco before he utters his next word. And I enjoyed the experience of the movie. But I also felt a little hurried - because I knew the ending. It as hard to see a person played like a puppet by his sub-ordinate. As
Essar pointed out in her review, we hope that like a typical hindi movie the hero will go against all odds and overcome his weaknesses. But then it doesn't. And that says something about the direction mainstream
Bollywood movies are taking - something that I'm personally happy to see. But knowing how the story was about to end lessened my enjoyment a bit. Interestingly, although the same happened with Maqbool as well, the experience of watching Omkara for some reason felt different. And I'm not sure why. But I came home after the movie and directly proceded to read
Baradwaj Rangan's review of the movie which I knew was favourable. Mr. Rangan's review of the movie is a great example of how a movie review has to be written. I enjoy reading his review for a lot of the same reasons I
used to enjoy reading
Roger Ebert's reviews
of the movie. Their reviews do more than just rate the movie. They inform you about how to appreciate the movie; how to identify the nuances of the actors and the film-makers and more importantly they inform you about how a movie has to be experienced. A lot of small but critical details that I missed when I saw the movie were brought to my attention when I went through Mr. Rangan's review. I do plan to watch the movie one more time if possible. But I digress. Coming back to his review Mr. Rangan writes about the movie:
"Omkara is Bhardwaj’s take on Othello, and by that I mean it’s based on the text of Othello and not merely the themes in Othello."
But later in the review identifying where the movie may have actually deviated (intentionally or unintentionally) from the Shakespearean tragedy, Mr. Rangan writes:
"Othello, similarly, is a great warrior whose actions are driven mainly by the insecurity of being a misfit in his society, a black man in the midst of whites. But Omkara has no reason to be insecure. The director makes him half-Brahmin, and gives us a scene where someone insults him about being a half-breed. But nothing much comes of this except one of the movie’s few lapses into triteness; when Omkara talks about this to Dolly, she consoles him that a half-moon is still the moon. But everywhere else, he’s a confident man at the top of his profession."
As I read this and then later as I thought more about this movie a thought occured to me. That it wasn't just the Omkara character that seemed out of place. It was that and the character of Langda Tyagi (played by Saif Ali Khan in one of the most mature roles I've seen him play) together that seemed to deviate from the original. Now before I say more, I think I must repeat that my knowledge of Othello is based on a
wikipedia article and the
review of 'O' by Roger Ebert. So please note this disclaimer before you read ahead. But coming back to my point: Othello is supposed to be a misfit in the society in which the story is cast and Iago is supposed to be a sub-ordinate to the former. Also Iago hates Othello and his intention is to put down the latter making use of the latter's jeolosy as a weapon. For this he uses Desdemona and Cassio as pawns without their knowing. While this is true in Omkara, what differs is the shade of difference and the and the portrayal of relationship between the characters of Othello and Iago as played by Ajay Devgan and Saif Ali Khan. In the movie, Saif Ali Khan displays the perfect loyalty to the Omkara character through most of the first half of the movie right until Omkara promotes Kesu Firangi (Vivek Oberoi - Cassio in Othello) over him (Langda Tyagi) as the 'Bahubali'. This slight hurts Landa Tyagi's plight and paves the way for revenge. But nowhere in his subsequent actions does the Tyagi character indicate that his vengence is single-pointedly targeted towards Omkara. Most of his actions including the dialog just before he shoots Kesu where he refers to the latter as "bhootpurva bahubali" or ex-General seem to indicate that he hated Kesu more than he hated Omkara. This I believe is a significant difference from Othello (and also 'O' for that matter). But this may have been an intentional deviation from the original. Vishal Bharadwaj is an amazing director (Its hard to believe that he started his career as a music director) and I doubt this subtle but important difference (at least in my opinion) could have been because of an over-sight on his part.
But to summarize, I think the movie is a landmark and I do hope Vishal Bharadwaj does continue this series and adapts more of Shakespeare's plays for Bollywood movies. Atleast I'll get to know them that way. :-). But to end this review, I would like to quote Mr. Rangan one last time. This quote I think captures the skill of Vishal Bharadwaj:
"EACH time Vishal Bhardwaj comes out with a Shakespeare adaptation, it’s tomtomed to the heavens as this Great Enterprise No One’s Ever Thought Of (Let Alone Attempted) Before. This is mainly because, I think, most people are intimidated by the Bard."
The real skill of Vishal Bhardwaj lies in the fact that he chose the right settings for these plays - making them accessible to an audience a quarter of a globle away from the place they were originally written. And that takes talent!